data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/551b3/551b34080de2e79c0bedc8ad3463e3c13d512d48" alt="NoteGenie logo"
The concept is intriguing, and it could be a game-changer for many.
However, the execution is poor; it often mishears, leading to inaccuracies.
It doesn't really help me; I still end up doing a lot of the work myself.
The speed of note capture is impressive. It allows me to focus on discussions without worrying about missing details.
Every now and then, it mixes up some phrases when capturing audio, which can be a bit frustrating.
It significantly reduces the time I spend on note-taking, allowing me to allocate more time to analyzing the information.
I appreciate that NoteGenie attempts to automate the note-taking process. The idea of using AI to capture details during meetings is revolutionary.
The accuracy isn't as high as I hoped. Sometimes it misses key points or misinterprets technical jargon, leading to incomplete notes.
It helps me save time during meetings, but I still have to spend extra time reviewing and correcting notes afterward.
The interface is user-friendly, and I can quickly get started without needing extensive training.
It often struggles with accents and fast speech, which results in a lot of inaccuracies. The performance is inconsistent.
It has the potential to streamline my note-taking, but I find myself redoing much of the work manually, which defeats the purpose.
The interface is decent, and it’s relatively easy to use for beginners.
But I find the AI is not reliable when it comes to technical subjects or jargon.
It helps with basic note-taking, but I still need to verify the details after the fact.
I appreciate the time it saves me during lectures. The AI does a reasonable job of capturing main ideas.
Occasionally, it struggles with complex sentences, which can result in important details being overlooked.
It enables me to focus on understanding rather than worrying about writing everything down.
I find the AI's ability to summarize conversations quite useful, especially for lengthy meetings.
Sometimes, it misinterprets my language, especially with idiomatic expressions, which can lead to confusion.
It helps distill key points from discussions, which is a huge time saver when preparing reports.
I love that it can save time during lectures and meetings. The AI does a decent job of capturing the essence of discussions.
Sometimes the formatting of the notes can be messy, and it requires some manual adjustments afterward.
It allows me to focus more on the conversation instead of writing everything down, which helps me engage better during discussions.
The idea of using AI for note-taking is exciting, and I was hopeful it would work well.
However, it often fails to capture my thoughts accurately, especially when I speak quickly.
It could help with organizing ideas, but I still find I need to revise everything afterward.
I like that it offers a chance to streamline the note-taking process.
However, its performance can be hit or miss, especially with background noise.
It can save some time, but I still find myself needing to edit extensively.
I like that it can record audio and transcribe it into notes, which is a great feature.
But the transcription accuracy is extremely variable and often leads to misunderstandings.
It helps me keep a record of discussions, but I still find myself needing to clarify points afterward.
The automated functionality is interesting and can save time if it works well.
In practice, it often requires heavy editing, which makes the automation feel pointless.
It could help with capturing initial thoughts during brainstorming sessions, but the final output needs a lot of work.
I like how it integrates with other tools I use, like calendars and task managers, which helps keep everything organized.
The AI sometimes gets confused with industry-specific terms, leading to miscommunication in the notes.
It helps me keep a record of meetings, but I still need to validate the accuracy of the notes, which can be time-consuming.
The concept of AI-assisted note-taking is appealing, and I was excited to try it out.
In reality, it often produces more errors than useful content, requiring me to spend more time fixing it.
It hasn't really solved any problems for me; I still have to do a lot of manual work.
I think the AI has potential, and the idea of automating notes is great.
However, it often fails to recognize important points and leaves out key information.
It doesn't really help me much. I still have to re-listen to recordings to fill in the gaps.
I liked the concept of automating note-taking and the initial setup was straightforward.
The output is often unusable due to poor transcription quality. I ended up taking notes manually anyway.
Unfortunately, it didn't solve any problems for me, as I had to redo all the note-taking myself.
I like the idea of having a digital assistant for taking notes.
The actual performance leaves much to be desired. It frequently misses key points.
It has the potential to reduce workload, but in practice, I still have to do a lot of manual note-taking.
I found the idea of automated note-taking very appealing.
However, the execution falls short; often, it misses critical information.
While it saves some time, I still have to fill in gaps manually, which is counterproductive.
Fireflies AI automates workflows with voice transcription, meeting summaries, action tracking, and enterprise-grade security.