The automated follow-up questions are a game changer. They help clarify candidates' qualifications effectively.
Sometimes, the scoring feels a bit arbitrary, and I wish there was more customization available.
It helps quickly filter through dozens of applications, ensuring I focus on the most suitable candidates.
The automation saves a lot of time, which is crucial in the busy hiring season.
I find the user experience lacking; it can be frustrating to use at times.
It does streamline the initial screening process, but I still need to rely on other methods for a comprehensive evaluation.
I appreciate the concept of automating candidate screening; it could save a lot of time in the hiring process.
The interface feels cluttered, and it’s not always intuitive to navigate through the screening questions.
It does help in narrowing down candidates quickly, but there are concerns about the accuracy of the scoring system.
The ability to compile profiles into Airtable is useful, making it easier to manage candidates.
The automated questions sometimes miss the nuances of a candidate's experience.
It streamlines the initial screening phase, but I often find myself needing to conduct additional manual evaluations.
I love the automation feature; it saves me hours of manual screening for each position.
The scoring system can be a bit confusing at times, especially when comparing candidates.
It helps ensure that only qualified applicants make it to the interview stage, which increases the efficiency of our hiring.
The integration with Airtable makes it easy to organize and review candidates.
I think it lacks some advanced features that other tools in the market offer.
It significantly reduces the time spent on initial candidate evaluations, allowing me to focus on the top contenders.
Scribe How automatically generates AI-driven how-to guides, including SOPs and training manuals, for enhanced efficiency and understanding.