It is quite efficient in analyzing text quickly, which is beneficial for my fast-paced content strategy work.
Sometimes it misses detecting AI-generated content, especially from newer models.
It helps me maintain the credibility of my content and ensure that my team’s work is authentic.
The interface is user-friendly and straightforward, making it easy to paste text for analysis.
It lacks advanced features that some competitor tools offer, such as detailed reports on detected content.
It helps identify AI-generated content, which is essential for my academic work, but I often second-guess its results.
I appreciate the idea of detecting AI-generated text, as it helps maintain authenticity in my writing.
The tool often gives false positives, labeling my original content as AI-generated, which can be frustrating.
It theoretically helps in verifying content authenticity, but due to inaccuracies, it creates more confusion than clarity.
It's straightforward and simple to use, which I find very helpful.
I feel that it lacks depth in its analysis and could benefit from additional features.
It provides a quick check for AI content, but I often find myself needing to double-check with other tools.
I like that it's a free tool, which is a plus for students like me.
The accuracy is really poor. It flagged my essay as AI-generated when it was completely original.
While I hoped it would help validate my work, the inaccuracy made it more of a hindrance than a help.
The concept of AI detection is great and necessary in today's content landscape.
The tool is unreliable at times, giving me the wrong results frequently.
While it aims to help with authenticity, its inconsistent results create more uncertainty than reassurance.