I really like the probability scores it provides, as they give me a clear indication of how likely the text is to be AI-generated.
The tool can be slow to process longer texts, which can be frustrating when I'm under a tight deadline.
It assists me in verifying the originality of content before publishing, ensuring that my work is credible and trustworthy.
I find the results useful and the probability metrics help guide my evaluation of text authenticity.
It often struggles with texts that are very creative or poetic, which can lead to frustration when trying to assess those types of works.
It assists in filtering out AI-generated content in my writing, but I sometimes have to cross-check with other tools for comprehensive analysis.
The accuracy of the predictions is impressive. I’ve relied on it for my research projects and it has consistently delivered reliable results.
It would be great if it could provide more detailed explanations on how it reached a certain probability, but overall it's quite functional.
It helps me ensure the integrity of my academic papers by flagging any potentially AI-generated sections, which is key for maintaining credibility.
I love how it provides instant feedback. The 50-token threshold is a great feature that gives you a sense of reliability early on.
The tool doesn’t handle very short texts well, which can be limiting for some of my quick reviews.
It aids in examining content for authenticity, which is particularly important for my work in digital marketing where credibility is key.
I appreciate the simplicity of the interface and how quickly it provides results after entering the text. It’s easy to use, which is great for anyone who isn’t very tech-savvy.
The accuracy of the detection can be hit or miss. Sometimes, it flags genuine text as fake, which could be problematic for important documents.
It helps me identify potentially AI-generated content in my writing projects, which is crucial for maintaining authenticity in academic work.
The fact that it uses RoBERTa makes me trust its capabilities. I've seen better results compared to other detectors I've tried.
Sometimes the interface feels a bit outdated, and I think it could benefit from a more modern design.
It helps me in my writing by ensuring that I don't inadvertently use AI-generated content, which is crucial in my line of work.
The straightforward user interface makes it easy for anyone to use and interpret the results quickly.
It can sometimes misclassify nuanced text, but it's rare and doesn't detract much from its overall utility.
It helps me validate content authenticity in journalism, which is crucial for maintaining trust with my audience.