The speed of generating images is impressive, making it a great tool for quick presentations.
Some styles can look a bit unrealistic, especially when dealing with intricate designs.
It helps me visualize client ideas more effectively and can create several options for them in a fraction of the time.
I appreciate the speed at which I can visualize concepts. It does save time in the early brainstorming stages.
The interface could be more user-friendly, and I often have to tweak settings multiple times to get the desired outcome.
It assists in the initial concept phase, but it can be frustrating when the output doesn't match my vision, requiring additional revisions.
I love how quickly it generates images. It's a great tool for creating mood boards and conceptual designs.
Sometimes the generated images don't capture the nuances of the materials or textures I want to show.
It allows me to present ideas to clients visually, which is invaluable in getting their feedback early in the design process.
The concept is fantastic; being able to generate photorealistic images from text is a great idea, especially for visualizing architecture.
The execution falls short. The images often lack detail and the styles can be inconsistent. It's not as reliable as I had hoped.
It helps me generate ideas quickly, but I find myself spending more time adjusting the outputs than I would if I started with sketches.
The ability to visualize different styles from just a description is incredible! It sparks creativity.
I wish it had more advanced features for customization to refine the generated images further.
It streamlines my design process, allowing me to quickly pivot ideas without starting from scratch each time.
It's a clever concept, and when it works well, it produces some stunning visuals.
The inconsistency in outputs is a big drawback. Sometimes it captures the essence of a design, other times it misses completely.
It can quickly generate ideas for clients but requires a lot of manual adjustments to get to a presentable state.