The initiative is a great way to celebrate the history of AI. I love that it recognizes lesser-known figures in the industry.
I think the selection process for who is considered a 'Godfather' could be more transparent.
It provides a platform for honoring AI contributors, which can help build a community around the shared appreciation of AI advancements.
The idea of creating a historic archive for AI figures is interesting and potentially valuable.
I find it hard to justify the cost, especially for higher tiers. It feels more like a money-making scheme than a genuine tribute.
It doesn't really solve any personal problems for me. It's more of a niche project that doesn't have widespread appeal.
I appreciate the concept of honoring AI pioneers. It’s a unique way to recognize those who have contributed to the field.
The pricing model can be confusing, and I feel the higher tiers are quite steep for what is essentially a recognition initiative.
It helps raise awareness about the contributions of AI innovators, which can inspire future generations. However, it doesn't provide any tangible benefits to users.
The project highlights the contributions of pioneers, which is something I feel very passionate about.
The site could use better navigation and clearer information on the selection criteria.
It fosters a sense of community among AI enthusiasts, which can lead to collaborations and networking.
I love the unique concept of immortalizing AI pioneers. It makes me feel connected to the history of technology.
It would be great if there were more engagement opportunities with the recognized figures.
It opens up discussions about AI's history and encourages learning about influential figures, which is beneficial for students and professionals alike.