The AI Chat feature is great for getting quick coding insights and tips.
It can sometimes misinterpret commands, leading to irrelevant suggestions that waste time.
It helps in speeding up the coding process by providing suggestions, but I still need to verify their applicability.
I appreciate how it simplifies unit test generation. It’s a real time-saver.
However, it occasionally gives suggestions that are too simplistic for complex problems.
It allows me to focus on the more critical aspects of development while the tool handles the repetitive parts.
The integration with Visual Studio Code is seamless, and the interface is user-friendly, making navigation easy.
The AI Chat feature often lacks depth in responses. Sometimes it offers generic advice that doesn't address specific coding issues.
It helps to some extent with code management, but I still find myself relying on traditional debugging methods since the AI doesn't always catch the nuances.
I really like the 'AI Lens' feature; it provides quick, contextual insights that help speed up my coding process.
While the tool is generally helpful, it can occasionally slow down my IDE, especially when processing larger codebases.
It significantly reduces the time spent on writing unit tests, allowing me to focus more on implementation and less on repetitive tasks.
I appreciate the idea of AI-assisted coding, especially the 'AI Test Storm' feature, which has the potential to save time in generating unit tests.
Unfortunately, the tool often struggles with accuracy in code suggestions. I've encountered multiple instances where the suggestions were either irrelevant or incorrect, which is frustrating.
It does help with generating unit tests, but the inconsistency in its performance means I often end up rewriting tests myself, which defeats the purpose of using an AI tool.
The AI-driven suggestions are helpful when they work; they can save a few minutes on coding tasks.
The inconsistency is a major issue; sometimes it provides great help, but other times it's completely off the mark.
It assists in quick problem resolution, but I often find myself double-checking its suggestions, which takes away from the efficiency aspect.
I enjoy the versatility of supporting multiple languages; it's excellent for multi-language projects.
The performance can be sluggish, especially with larger projects, which hampers productivity.
It helps streamline the coding process, but the lag often leads me back to traditional methods, which is counterproductive.
The idea of AI-assisted coding is exciting and has potential.
However, the tool often misses the mark in providing relevant suggestions.
It assists with some coding tasks, but I still find myself doing most of the heavy lifting myself.
The support for over 30 programming languages is fantastic, making it versatile for different projects.
There are times when the code suggestions feel a bit too simplistic and don't account for advanced coding patterns.
It helps streamline the coding process, particularly with repetitive tasks. This benefit allows me to allocate my time to more critical problem-solving tasks.
I think the concept is innovative, especially in assisting with coding and testing.
The performance is quite poor. It lags frequently, and I find it more of a hindrance than a help.
To be honest, I haven't found it particularly helpful. I still end up doing most of the work manually, which negates the tool's purpose.
I wanted to like the AI-driven approach, but the execution is lacking.
The tool is frequently unresponsive and rarely provides accurate code suggestions.
Sadly, it hasn't solved any significant problems for me; I've had to rely on my own coding skills instead.
I like the potential of the tool and its integration with VS Code; it feels promising.
However, the execution is lacking. It often fails to generate relevant tests for my code.
It claims to help with unit tests, but I've found myself manually creating them most of the time, which is counterproductive.