The customization aspect is fantastic. I can tailor the rules to fit our project’s specific needs.
The documentation could be improved. Sometimes I struggle to find help on specific features.
It helps enforce coding standards consistently across the team, but I find it can be quite resource-intensive.
I appreciate that Lintrule allows me to write rules in plain language, which makes it easier to customize the tool for my specific needs.
The main issue I have is that it sometimes flags false positives, which can be frustrating and lead to unnecessary extra work.
Lintrule helps identify bugs that automated tests often miss, which is a plus, but the false positives can complicate the review process.
The ability to enforce customized rules is a strong feature; it allows us to address specific coding standards effectively.
The command-line interface can be a bit intimidating for new users, and the learning curve is steep.
It helps in catching issues early in the code review process, but I wish the integration with GitHub was smoother.
I love how flexible Lintrule is. The ability to define rules in plain language makes it accessible for team members who may not be as technical.
Sometimes, the tool can be slow in processing large codebases, which affects our workflow during code reviews.
It helps reduce oversight by finding bugs that traditional linters miss, ultimately improving our code quality before deployment.
I appreciate the integration with GitHub. It allows for a seamless code review process.
There are some issues with performance on larger projects, which can slow down the review process.
It significantly reduces the time spent on manual code reviews, giving us more time to focus on development.
The ability to write rules in a simple language is great and makes it easier for everyone to contribute.
I find it hard to use with complex rules, as it often leads to confusion and false alerts.
While it can catch bugs that are usually missed, the overall experience has been quite frustrating due to false positives.