The integration with GitHub is seamless, and I like the idea of having a security buddy right in my pull request workflow.
It can be slow to analyze complex pull requests, which sometimes holds up the deployment process.
It helps in identifying security vulnerabilities early on, although the occasional delays can make it challenging during tight deadlines.
I like the integration with GitHub; it makes it easier to incorporate security checks without leaving my workflow.
The tool sometimes misses certain vulnerabilities that other security tools catch, which makes me hesitant to rely on it completely.
It helps in streamlining security checks during code reviews, making it easier for my team to focus on coding rather than worrying about security loopholes.
I appreciate the concept of integrating security checks directly into the development process. The idea of having a security buddy is innovative.
The tool is quite slow when analyzing larger pull requests, which can be frustrating during high-pressure development times.
It does offer real-time feedback on code security, which helps in identifying vulnerabilities early, but the lag in processing can negate this benefit.
The near real-time feedback on pull requests is a game changer. It allows me to address security concerns immediately.
Sometimes the user interface can be a bit confusing, especially for new team members who aren't used to security tools.
It significantly improves our code quality by catching potential security issues before they go into production, which ultimately saves us time and resources.
The concept is great, but the execution leaves much to be desired.
The performance is poor, and it often fails to provide meaningful feedback. I've had better experiences with other tools.
Unfortunately, I haven't found it helpful in solving any problems. The delays and inaccuracies make it more of a hindrance than a help.