The ability to upload design files directly makes it relatively easy to get started.
The generated code often lacks comments, making it hard to understand for someone who is not very experienced in coding.
It helps in creating a base code structure, but requires additional learning to refine the output effectively.
I appreciate the concept of the tool. The idea of converting design elements to code is innovative and could save a lot of time.
The execution is lacking. I found that the tool often misinterprets design elements, leading to significant manual corrections afterward.
While it aims to streamline the coding process, it often creates more problems than it solves, requiring additional effort to fix the output.
I like the initial concept which aligns with current demands for efficiency in web development.
The processing speed is quite slow; it takes longer than expected to convert designs into code.
It attempts to solve the design-to-code gap, but the results often require more manual intervention than expected.
I like that it can handle basic design elements well and can be a good tool for quick prototypes.
The output can sometimes be inconsistent, and it struggles with more complex layouts.
It helps in quickly converting ideas into a working prototype, but it requires additional tools for thorough development.
I liked the promise of the tool to ease the design-to-code transition.
The tool is buggy and frequently crashes. I lost my work several times, which was incredibly frustrating.
It doesn't effectively solve any problems for me, as the flaws in its output require more time to fix than it saves.
The integration with OpenAI for GPT4 vision is a great feature that shows promise for future improvements.
The tool often fails to properly render complex design elements, which means I have to adjust them manually later.
It offers a starting point for developers, but the quality of code generated means I still spend a lot of time refining it.
The idea of streamlining the design-to-code process is appealing, and I think it could be useful if improved.
The user interface is not intuitive, making it hard to navigate for first-time users. It could use a overhaul.
It provides a rough draft of code, but the inaccuracies lead to more troubleshooting than actual coding.
The ability to quickly turn designs into code is fantastic, especially for someone like me who isn’t a professional coder.
Sometimes the code lacks certain responsive features, requiring additional adjustments for mobile compatibility.
It significantly reduces the coding time for simple designs, allowing me to focus more on creativity rather than coding.
The drag-and-drop feature is user-friendly, making it easy to upload designs without much hassle.
The generated code is often messy and not well-structured, which complicates further development.
It can save time on initial coding; however, it demands a lot of cleanup, which can negate the time savings.
The AI integration is quite impressive and shows potential for future updates that could improve functionality.
While the tool is great for simple tasks, it does not perform well with intricate design details.
It saves time on simpler projects, allowing me to focus on intricate design aspects rather than basic coding.
The tool has a good potential for beginner developers to learn about code structure.
It can be quite frustrating to use when it doesn't interpret certain design elements correctly.
It gives a head start in creating functional code, but the inaccuracies often lead to more confusion for learners.
