I really like the collaborative coding feature. It allows my team to work together effectively, and the real-time suggestions are quite helpful.
The code validation process can sometimes be slow, and I've encountered a few bugs that required manual correction.
It helps in automating a part of the coding process, which saves time and reduces human errors. This is beneficial, especially under tight deadlines.
The speed at which it generates code based on my test cases is incredible. It significantly reduces the time I spend on repetitive tasks.
I wish there were more tutorials available, as I found some advanced features somewhat difficult to master at first.
It helps me produce quality code faster, allowing me to focus on more complex problems and enhancing my overall productivity.
The concept of test-driven development integrated with code generation is innovative. It has great potential.
Unfortunately, the execution falls short. The AI often misinterprets my requirements, leading to irrelevant code generation.
While it aims to speed up coding, I've found myself spending more time correcting the output than if I had written the code myself.
I appreciate the intention behind CopilotChat, especially its capability to generate code based on test cases. This is a novel approach that could potentially streamline the coding process.
However, I found the interface somewhat clunky and not as intuitive as I had hoped. It requires a steep learning curve to fully utilize its features.
While it does assist in generating code, I still find myself needing to validate and troubleshoot extensively afterward. This doesn't save as much time as I expected.
I love how CopilotChat encourages a test-driven approach. It’s a good practice that I believe all developers should adopt.
Sometimes the code generated doesn't align perfectly with the test cases, which requires additional debugging.
It streamlines the development process, allowing me to produce reliable code faster, which is a huge advantage for my projects.