CodeAssist is a natural, human-like chatbot designed to assist with writing code in Jetbrains IDEs and Visual Studio Code. It features a natural language interface, the ability to access and modify code in the editor, is powered by GPT-4, and can perform actions like opening files. While it has long-term memory within a session, it may make mistakes that require developer intervention for correction. CodeAssist works with all popular programming languages and can be installed in Jetbrains IDEs and Visual Studio Code. Users interact with CodeAssist by instructing it on tasks and supervising its output, making it a useful tool for developers seeking a more intuitive coding experience.
CodeAssist was created by an innovative AI programming assistant powered by GPT-4. The founder remains undisclosed in the available documents, but the company behind CodeAssist can be contacted at [email protected]. The tool offers a natural language interface for coding tasks and is designed to streamline the developer workflow within Jetbrains IDEs and Visual Studio Code.
To use CodeAssist, follow these steps:
CodeAssist offers a natural language interface, code access, and modifications, all powered by GPT-4. It can execute actions and supports multiple programming languages. Note that it is a paid service with the option of free credits initially. Expect occasional bugs as it is continuously evolving.
Paid plans start at $1/credit and include:
I appreciate the idea of having a GPT-4 powered chatbot that can assist with coding. The natural language interface is an interesting feature and does offer some convenience when writing code.
However, I encountered issues with its accuracy. It sometimes suggests incorrect code snippets that need substantial modification before they work, which can be frustrating.
It helps to reduce the initial time spent on coding by suggesting ideas, but I still find myself double-checking everything it produces. It’s a mixed bag at this point.
The integration with Jetbrains IDEs is seamless, and I love how I can simply type my requirements and get code suggestions almost instantly.
The long-term memory could be improved; it forgets context after a while, which can force me to repeat my instructions frequently.
It significantly speeds up the coding process by providing quick solutions and reducing the need to search for documentation constantly.
The concept of having a coding assistant is great, and I think the potential is there for making development easier.
Unfortunately, the execution falls short. I've faced numerous instances where the chatbot misunderstands my requests or provides irrelevant code.
While it tries to help with code suggestions, I often end up spending more time correcting its proposals than I would have if I wrote the code myself.